Nuclear safety scandal


Black marks for Aldermaston

Sunday October 24, 1999

THE OBSERVER asked independent nuclear engineer John Large to comment on the Atomic Weapons Establishment's reports of 10 out of more than 100 incidents over the past year.

15/1/99 Insulating material in roof found to be compressed straw and paper.

JL: A very high fire risk in a nuclear materials area.

24/12/98 Nine facilities over Christmas allowed regulatory stack filters to exceed deployment times.

JL: This may have had an environmental discharge im-pact, that if the filters 'blocked', then radioactive particulate matter could have escaped into the atmosphere - really poor and ill-disciplined maintenance management.

9/2/99 Employee entered exclusion area without appropriate protection.

JL: Probably not wearing respiratory protection, but this incident defined by AWE as not reportable, whereas it would be reportable at any other nuclear installation.

3/3/99 Ongoing defects found with pressurised air suits after operations in radioactive areas.

JL: These suits are the first (and last) line of protection for personnel in contaminated areas - strange that defects are ongoing.

3/3/99 Unexpected contents found in an explosive container, resulting in the area being evacuated.

JL: Astonishing!

22/3/99 All fire fighting pumping appliances at Alder maston unfit for service.

JL: Incredible - setting aside its nuclear weapons function, the industrial and radio-chemical processes undertaken at Aldermaston are hazardous and risky.

27/4/99 Surge protectors (part of lightning protection system) found to have been locked off and fuses removed.

JL: A fully assembled nuclear weapon is susceptible to risk of electro-magnetic surges (from lightning) which could, conceivably, trigger the conventional high-explosive charges that initiate the nuclear sequence.

19/5/99 Power failure offsite caused widespread disruption to electrical supplies on site.

JL: This could be extremely serious, because a number of processes require continuous power to maintain stability and/or safety - this is quite astonishing for such a hazardous plant. What will happen at Y2K when it is believed the National Grid will be very susceptible to blackouts?

14/5/99 Electrical power failure resulted in loss of emergency phone extensions.

JL: Again, astonishingly, suggests that this high-tech and hazardous plant cannot survive a power blackout unscathed - a power blackout is the time when emergency phones will most likely be required.

1/9/99 Non-routine groundwater samples indicate HEU contamination on Blacks land adjacent to A18 manhole.

JL: I cannot recall this being publicly reported.

Related stories:
British nuclear arms plant close to disaster
The timebomb that threatens Britain